Archive for the ‘Devious Finance’ Category

Financial Burlesque

Tuesday, November 16th, 2010

the_circus_lady_postcard-p239038413529399991trah_380One of the little joys of opening a new Facebook page is making new “friends.” Like most everything else in the new world, these relationships are more imagined than real. Even when impassioned they are, at best, arguments between avatars.

Grovyman would like to thank the numerous burlesque artists that have accepted our “friendship.” These lovely women are experts at the art of the tease. They allude to forbbiden pleasures without assenting to the act.

The best burlesque artists, in fact, need only to suggest the presence of a tit for their audience. A real twit throws away his money on strippers. It would seem, therefore, that burlesque would appeal to most investment bankers on Wall Street, given their obsession with illusions. These individuals prefer to lay money down on the “underlying assets” behind the tits and ass. While only they (i.e. Goldman Sachs) determine what those assets might be, they are, supposedly, a very beautiful thing.

Which brings us to the pimping exercise called modern finance. When people talk about “modern finance” what they really mean is the carnal lust for cash. Because real assets rarely exist anymore, the sure way to acquire more cash is to create representations thereof. The Wall Street synthetic CDO (collateralized debt obligation) is a beautiful example of the genre’.

How tempting these tools must have been for “sophisticated” investors looking for ever bigger wins. Like anyone who plays fantasy football knows, the illusion of having a Michael Vick (sadly) on your team is intoxicating. Much like a fantasy football pool, a synthetic CDO allows “sophisticated” financial investors play out their bets based on a “represented value” of an asset pool.

There’s nothing real in a synthetic financial instrument. Yet is is precisely due to the obscene profits these “financial plays” delivered that these “synthetic CDOs” are still not banned. They still hold too much promise, we assume, for the quick buck in a tight race or bad financial year end. That is why the biggest Pimps (Goldman, Morgan, UBS) don’t even have to pay off the enforcers to keep pushing them on the rest of America.

This is financial prostitution. Pure and simple.

I prefer the more gentle illusions of burlesque.

Now if our “friends” could just lure William Ackmann, John Paulson and Henry Kravis as fans we might all avoid getting hosed.

We’ve given up on Congressman Frank.

Does Hell Have a Health Plan?

Monday, November 15th, 2010

lucifer_75_p091Shareholder value.

There are few more beautiful words in the English language. While their lapidary quality emanates from an economic tradition of creating wealth that governments, Goldman Sachs, George Soros and other fellow travelers often exploit, such mischief pales in comparison to the sins committed in the name of for-profit “Health Maintenance Organizations,” or HMOs.

No other class in the American Plutocracy has done more to vitiate the meaning of “shareholder value” as they create it by reducing both quantity and quality of their product while increasing its cost.

And heck, they don’t even manufacture the “product” they sell. Instead they pervert what is produced by others for their own profit. In almost any other industry, would be considered a shrewd approach to creating shareholder value except for the fact that their “product” is a person’s health, which makes you wonder whether we are talking about economics or ethics. Which is my way of saying that only God holds the answer to this question, or that at the very least, it is both a logical and teleological question.

And if God is good, then HMOs are bad.

Even if God is something else altogether, they are still questionable.

10161mEven to Mammon.

After having spent half a lifetime following her with varying degrees of success, I would say that she has been deeply disappointed by the actions of a few wealthy HMOs. It’s not the chandeliers that the mid-upper level executives of United Health Care have their illegal help light with candles that disappoints her. It’s not even the fact that the spouses of such executives spend more energy on getting the street name changed for their faux French mansions to reflect their new social status for which they are excoriated in the very society columns they really need to crack.

She is perturbed primarily because she realizes that it’s not that useful to have all that cash tied up in a static industry like insurance. And as much as it pains her to admit it, she would rather see an Executive who is a member of the tribe, like say, Steven Jobs, take over the whole sordid mess.

If Apple-like peeps ran the health care industry we’d soon be seeing iPads in waiting rooms instead of the geriatric garbage that no one seems to read. And we may just have spouses with good taste in modernism that actually increase the architectural diversity of the suburbs. And, and, we may be able to do away with retail monstrosities like Brighton Collectibles and St. John Knit stores because people with money will actually demand the same inventiveness when they spend their surplus cash.

Which, if the laws of Austrian economics apply, everyone will soon have more of.

In fact, on that note, it leads me to question who or what these particular HMO executives worship.

They are far too status conscious to follow a Richard Dawkin or Christopher Hitchens. And they may find the faith of their fathers and mothers a bit too quaint. Which makes me question why anyone would actually take the trouble to have their illegal servants light candles in a chandelier? In a garage no less.

I fear this strange rite is actually a form of séance.

With a force that really scares me.

Which is why I call on a higher power to fix things.

Before everything goes to hell.

Pay-per-Post. Protested.

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

hh-016Starving bloggers can be paid to post things on their blogs (for starvation wages). Anyone with the semblance of a brain will realize that the blogger is posting for pay (at a pittance) and will ignore the content. Paid editorial is what we call “advertorial” and it has always been waste of paper in print and brainpower in bits. (Which makes the first even more wasteful.)

Be assured that groovyman.com will not take pay for a post unless we can first try the product. Furthermore, if we do not develop a very dark tan after the first few applications and or need to fight off numerous admirers with our man purses, we will send the product back. Finally, we will continue to excoriate the crap that people actually pay others to post about.*

(*Unlike the beautiful and inspired piece of sculpture from the Akron Public Library System that we have used to adorn this post. We understand it may be for sale. We’d post more about it, but no one will pay us.)